Journal of International Oncology ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (3): 157-165.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20231016-00025

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction of efficacy of early-stage tumor markers combined with NLR and PLR for immunotherapy in gastric cancer

Xie Shuping1,2, Sun Yahong3(), Wang Chao4()   

  1. 1Department of Graduate School, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan 250117, China
    2Department of Medical Oncology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250031, China
    3Department of Cancer Center, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital, Jinan 250031, China
    4Department of Minimally Invasive Tumor Ward, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an 271099, China
  • Received:2023-10-16 Revised:2023-12-19 Online:2024-03-08 Published:2024-04-10
  • Contact: Sun Yahong, Email: sunyahong@sdfmu.edu.cn; Wang Chao, Email: wangchaogongzuo@126.com

Abstract:

Objective To explore the predictive value of early serum tumor markers (STM), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) combination score on the efficacy of gastric cancer immunotherapy. Methods A total of 76 patients with gastric cancer who received immunotherapy at Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2022 were selected. Patients' leading STM, NLR, PLR were collected. Optimal cut-off value of NLR and PLR were determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The clinical efficacy and prognosis of different leading STM, NLR, PLR and combined scores in gastric cancer patients received immunotherapy were analyzed. ROC curve was used to evaluate the predictive efficiency of each index and the combined score. Cox regression model was used to analyze the factors affecting patients' survival. Results The best truncation value for NLR was 2.75, and the best truncation value for PLR was 175.9. All patients completed at least 2 cycles of immunotherapy, the objective response rate (ORR) was 23.7% (18/76), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 88.2% (67/76). There were no significant differences in ORR [(20.9% (9/43) vs. 27.3% (9/33)], DCR [83.7% (36/43) vs. 93.9% (31/33)] between the high NLR group (n=43) and low NLR group (n=33) (χ2=0.42, P=0.519; χ2=1.02, P=0.313). There were no significant differences in ORR [27.3% (12/44) vs. 18.8% (6/32)], DCR [81.8% (36/44) vs. 96.9% (31/32)] between the high PLR group (n=44) and low PLR group (n=32) (χ2=0.75, P=0.388; χ2=2.71, P=0.555). The ORR for the high combined score group (n=39) and low combined score group (n=37) was 17.9% (7/39) and 29.7% (11/37), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ2=1.46, P=0.230); the DCR was 79.5% (31/39) and 97.3% (36/37), respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=4.19, P=0.041). The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 76 patients were 8.0 and 12.0 months. The median PFS in the high NLR group and low NLR group was 7.0 and 10.0 months, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=7.95, P=0.005); the median OS was 12.0 and 14.0 months, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ2=1.04, P=0.307). The median PFS in the high PLR group and low PLR group was 8.0 and 10.0 months, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=3.90, P=0.048); the median OS was 13.0 and 13.0 months, respectively, with no significant difference (χ2=0.02, P=0.896). The median PFS in the high combined score group and low combined score group was 7.0 and 10.0 months, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=13.52, P<0.001); the median OS was 12.0 and 14.0 months, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ2=5.02, P=0.025). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curve (AUC) of leading STM, NLR, PLR and combined score to predict the efficacy of gastric cancer immunotherapy was 0.662, 0.697, 0.601 and 0.773. Univariate analysis showed that, surgery (HR=0.59, 95%CI: 0.36-0.95, P=0.031), leading STM (HR=0.57, 95%CI: 0.34-0.93, P=0.026), NLR (HR=0.54, 95%CI: 0.34-0.87, P=0.011), combined score (HR=0.42, 95%CI: 0.26-0.68, P<0.001) were all influencing factors for PFS in gastric cancer patients received immunotherapy; tumor stage (HR=0.30, 95%CI: 0.12-0.75, P=0.011), leading STM (HR=0.28, 95%CI: 0.15-0.50, P<0.001), combined score (HR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.31-0.96, P=0.036) were all influencing factors for OS in gastric cancer patients received immunotherapy. Multivariate analysis showed that, leading STM (HR=0.56, 95%CI: 0.33-0.98, P=0.041) was an independent influencing factor for PFS in gastric cancer patients received immunotherapy; tumor stage (HR=0.29, 95%CI: 0.11-0.76, P=0.012), leading STM (HR=0.32, 95%CI: 0.17-0.58, P<0.001), combined score (HR=0.46, 95%CI: 0.25-0.82, P=0.009) were all independent influencing factors for OS in gastric cancer patients received immunotherapy. Conclusion The combined score of leading STM, NLR and PLR is an independent factor influencing OS in patients receiving immunotherapy for gastric cancer, and can predict the efficacy of immunotherapy for gastric cancer.

Key words: Stomach neoplasms, Biomarkers, tumor, Immune checkpoint inhibitors, Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, Platelet to lymphocyte ratio