Journal of International Oncology ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8): 478-482.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673422X.2018.08.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Relationships between expression of hypoxiainducible factor1α protein and clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer

Huang Chunzhen, Li Jianwang, Yuan Jianhua, Mao Shanshan, Chen Qionghui, Zhang Weifang   

  1. Department of Oncology, Haikou People′s Hospital of Hainan Province (Affiliated Haikou Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine of Central South University), Haikou 570208, China
  • Online:2018-08-08 Published:2018-11-01
  • Contact: Li Jianwang E-mail:ljw7505@163.com
  • Supported by:

    Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Hainan Province of China (14A210246)

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the expression level of hypoxiainducible factor1α (HIF1α) in gastric cancer and its relationship with clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. MethodsFrom March 3, 2011 to September 28, 2012, 49 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma tissue chips were selected from pathology department of our hospital. They were matched with paracancerous tissues. The expression levels of HIF1α were measured by immunohistochemistry method in gastric cancer tissues and paracancerous tissues chips. KaplanMeier was used to evaluate the progressionfree survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze whether HIF1α was a prognostic factor. ResultsThe high expression rate of HIF1α protein in gastric cancer was significantly higher than that in paired paracarcinoma group (42.9% vs. 4.1%, χ2=20.509, P<0.001). The expression of HIF1α protein was related to TNM stage (χ2=4.601, P=0.032), vascular invasion (χ2=6.766, P=0.009) and degree of differentiation (χ2=7.969, P=0.005). Compared with patients with low expression of HIF1α, the median PFS (16.2 months vs. 27.3 months) and median OS (34.8 months vs. 43.8 months) were shorter in the patients with high expression of HIF1α, and the differences were statistically significant (median PFS: χ2=4.661, P=0.002; median OS: χ2=6.903, P=0.009). The results of single factor analysis showed that overexpression of HIF1α was correlated with PFS and OS (PFS: HR=4.461, 95%CI: 1.96910.802, P<0.001; OS: HR=3.109, 95%CI: 1.2747.588,P=0.013).  The results of Cox multivariate analysis showed that overexpression of HIF1α was the independent risk factor that affected the survival and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (PFS: HR=4.747, 95%CI: 2.17510.230, P<0.001; OS: HR=3.171, 95%CI: 1.3587.404, P=0.008). ConclusionThe high expression rate of HIF1α protein in gastric cancer tissues is significantly higher than that in paracancerous tissues. The expression of HIF1α is associated with TNM stage, vascular invasion, degree of differentiation in patients with gastric cancer. The high expression of HIF1α is associated with the shorter median OS and PFS. The high expression of HIF1α is an independent risk factor for the survival and prognosis of patients with gastric cancer, which is expected to be an independent marker of poor prognosis.

Key words: Stomach neoplasms, Hypoxiainducible factor 1, Pathology, clinical, Prognosis