Efficacy analysis of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer after failure of second-line chemotherapy

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20210115-00023

Abstract

Abstract:

Objectiv e To observe the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who failed second-line chemotherapy. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 80 patients with advanced NSCLC who had failed second-line chemotherapy admitted in the Department of Oncology of Chaohu Hospital of Anhui Medical University from January 2017 to October 2019, and the patients were divided into control group (n=36) and observation group (n=44) according to the different treatment regimens. The control group was given pemetrexed + cisplatin, and the observation group adopted pemetrexed + cisplatin + anlotinib. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), changes in levels of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) and treatment-related adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results After 2 cycles of treatment, the ORR in the control group and observation group were 5.56% (2/36) and 18.18% (8/44), with no statistically significant difference (χ²=1.85, P=0.174). The DCR in the two groups were 58.33% (21/36) and 81.82% (36/44), and the DCR in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ ²=5.33, P=0.021). The median PFS in the two groups were 4.0 months and 6.0 months, and the median PFS in the observation group was longer than that in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ ²=28.47, P<0.001). The median OS in the two groups were 13.0 months and 14.8 months, with no statistically significant difference (χ²=1.56, P=0.212). The levels of serum VEGF [(21.72±5.42) ng/L vs. (36.97±7.53) ng/L, t=14.13, P<0.001; (16.61±4.14) ng/L vs. (38.85±8.61) ng/L, t=23.09, P<0.001], CEA [(4.91±1.58) ng/ml vs. (6.62±2.84) ng/ml, t=4.64, P<0.001; (3.07±1.32) ng/ml vs. (7.08±3.31) ng/ml, t=11.50, P<0.001] and CA199 [(16.83±5.23) U/ml vs. (20.95±7.94) U/ml, t=3.75, P<0.001; (13.37±5.85) U/ml vs. (21.66±8.72) U/ml, t=7.55, P<0.001] in the control group and observation group after 2 cycles of treatment were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment, and the levels of serum VEGF, CEA and CA199 in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (t=4.78, P<0.001; t=5.68, P<0.001; t=2.76, P=0.007). The incidence of elevated blood pressure in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [25.00% (11/44) vs. 2.78% (1/36), χ ²=7.67, P=0.006]. Conclusion Pemetrexed + cisplatin + anlotinib regimen for patients with advanced NSCLC who failed second-line chemotherapy can improve DCR, prolong PFS and improve the levels of serum tumor-related markers, with controllable adverse reactions.

Key words: Carcinoma,non-small-cell lung, Prognosis, Anlotinib, Efficacy evaluation

Sheng Xiao'an, Wang Chao, Xiao Xin, Tong Sihao. Efficacy analysis of anlotinib combined with chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer after failure of second-line chemotherapy[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2022, 49(3): 134-139.

Figures/Tables 5

References 13

[1]	中国医师协会肿瘤医师分会; 中国临床肿瘤学会血管靶向治疗专家委员会; 中国抗癌协会肿瘤靶向治疗专业委员会. 盐酸安罗替尼治疗晚期肺癌中国专家共识(2020版)[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2020, 42(10):807-816. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200721-00669. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20200721-00669
[2]	李凡敏, 魏茂刚, 范华, 等. 培美曲塞联合铂类方案三线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及疾病预后[J]. 实用癌症杂志, 2018, 33(9):1424-1426. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2018.09.010. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5930.2018.09.010
[3]	刘楠, 吴秀伟, 李烦繁, 等. 安罗替尼三线及以上治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌近期疗效和生命质量分析[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 46(3):147-152. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2019.03.004. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2019.03.004
[4]	邹宜覃, 宁方政, 张景熙, 等. 盐酸安罗替尼治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌临床疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 国际呼吸杂志, 2020, 40(7):493-498. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131368-20190621-00932. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn131368-20190621-00932
[5]	岳东升, 王长利. 非小细胞肺癌辅助靶向治疗进展[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2018, 45(23):1225-1229. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.23.173. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8179.2018.23.173
[6]	刘思远, 李志鹏, 郑心. 肺抑瘤合剂联合AP化疗方案治疗非小细胞肺癌临床疗效观察[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志, 2018, 24(3):185-190. DOI: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.2018030185. doi: 10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.2018030185
[7]	刘冬英, 吴海鹰, 曾涌波, 等. INP和AP方案三线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的近期疗效观察[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2016, 23(21):1441-1445. DOI: 10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2016.21.008. doi: 10.16073/j.cnki.cjcpt.2016.21.008
[8]	Wu D, Nie J, Dai L, et al. Salvage treatment with anlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer[J]. Thorac Cancer, 2019, 10(7):1590-1596. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.13120. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13120
[9]	Han B, Li K, Zhao Y, et al. Anlotinib as a third-line therapy in patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, randomised phase Ⅱ trial (ALTER0302)[J]. Br J Cancer, 2018, 118(5):654-661. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2017.478. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.478
[10]	汪硕敏, 顾康生. 血清癌胚抗原、铁蛋白和糖基抗原199在非小细胞肺癌诊断中的临床价值[J]. 安徽医科大学学报, 2018, 53(9):1444-1447. DOI: 10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2018.09.026. doi: 10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2018.09.026
[11]	黄丽珍, 车建华, 段相会, 等. 非小细胞肺癌患者血清CYFRA21-1、VEGF及CEA的表达及与临床病理特征的相关性研究[J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2018, 18(7):1344-1347. DOI: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2018.07.031. doi: 10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2018.07.031
[12]	陈小燕, 任燕, 张海波, 等. 安罗替尼上市后不良反应高血压的监测[J]. 泰山医学院学报, 2020, 41(5):357-359. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7115.2020.05.008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7115.2020.05.008
[13]	徐伟佳, 高勇, 吴雪. 临床药师对3例安罗替尼治疗晚期肺癌致不良反应的药学监护[J]. 中国药房, 2019, 30(19):2727-2731. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2019.19.26. doi: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2019.19.26

一般临床特征	对照组(n=36)	观察组(n=44)	t/χ²值	P值
年龄(岁)	56.15±8.38	54.84±9.86	0.63	0.529
体重指数(kg/m²)	22.11±2.72	21.69±2.94	0.66	0.513
性别
男	24	29	0.01	0.943
女	12	15
病理类型
腺癌	28	31	0.55	0.459
鳞状细胞癌	8	13
临床分期
ⅢB	6	5	0.13	0.720
Ⅳ	30	39
EGFR突变
是	9	12	0.05	0.818
否	27	32
PS评分(分)
0~1分	26	30	0.15	0.695
2分	10	14
吸烟史
有	25	28	0.30	0.585
无	11	16
一线化疗
长春瑞滨+顺铂	11	15
紫杉醇+顺铂	15	17	0.12	0.940
双氟胞苷+顺铂	10	12
二线化疗
紫杉醇+顺铂	7	11
吉西他滨+顺铂	14	16	0.35	0.839
多西他赛+顺铂	15	17

组别	CR	PR	SD	PD	客观缓解		疾病控制
对照组(n=36)	0(0)	2(5.56)	19(52.78)	15(41.67)	2(5.56)		21(58.33)
观察组(n=44)	0(0)	8(18.18)	28(63.64)	8(18.18)	8(18.18)		36(81.82)
Z/χ²值	2.57					1.85		5.33
P值	0.010					0.174		0.021

不良反应	对照组(n=36)			观察组(n=44)			χ²值	P值
不良反应	1~2级	3~4级	合计	1~2级	3~4级	合计	χ²值	P值
恶心呕吐	5	1	6	8	2	10	0.46	0.500
肝功能异常	4	0	4	6	0	6	0.12	0.734
肾功能异常	3	0	3	4	0	4	-	>0.999
血小板降低	2	0	2	1	0	1	-	0.585
骨髓抑制	1	0	1	2	0	2	-	>0.999
口腔黏膜炎	0	0	0	4	0	4	-	0.123
血压升高	1	0	1	10	1	11	7.67	0.006
咯血	0	0	0	2	0	2	-	0.499
乏力	2	0	2	7	0	7	2.13	0.146
手足综合征	1	0	1	4	0	4	-	0.372

[1]	Qian Xiaotao, Shi Ziyi, Hu Ge, Wu Xiaowei. Efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy for stage Ⅲ-ⅣA esophageal squamous cell carcinoma： a real-world clinical study [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(6): 326-331.
[2]	Yang Mi, Bie Jun, Zhang Jiayong, Deng Jiaxiu, Tang Zuge, Lu Jun. Analysis of the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(6): 332-337.
[3]	Fan Zhipeng, Yu Jing, Hu Jing, Liao Zhengkai, Xu Yu, Ouyang Wen, Xie Conghua. Predictive value of changes in inflammatory markers for prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with the first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(5): 257-266.
[4]	Yang Lin, Lu Ning, Wen Hua, Zhang Mingxin, Zhu Lin. Study on the clinical relationship between inflammatory burden index and gastric cancer [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(5): 274-279.
[5]	Liu Pingping, He Xuefang, Zhang Yi, Yang Xu, Zhang Shanshan, Ji Yifei. Risk factors of postoperative recurrence in patients with primary brain glioma and prediction model construction [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(4): 193-197.
[6]	Wan Fang, Yang Gang, Li Rui, Wan Qijing. Expression levels and clinical significance of serum miR-497 and miR-383 in patients with esophageal cancer [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(4): 204-209.
[7]	Yao Yixin, Shen Yulin. Predictive value of serum SOCS3 and TXNIP levels for the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with TACE [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(4): 217-222.
[8]	Sun Weiwei, Yao Xuemin, Wang Pengjian, Wang Jing, Jia Jinghao. Exploration of prognostic factors and nomogram construction for advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy based on hematologic indexes [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(3): 143-150.
[9]	Liu Yulan, Jing Haiyan, Sun Jing, Song Wei, Sha Dan. Advances in predicting efficacy and prognostic markers of immunotherapy for gastric cancer [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(3): 175-180.
[10]	Peng Qin, Cai Yuting, Wang Wei. Advances on KPNA2 in liver cancer [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(3): 181-185.
[11]	Chen Boguang, Wang Sugui, Zhang Yongjie. Role of serum cholinesterase and inflammatory markers in the prognosis of stage ⅠA -ⅢA breast cancer [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(2): 73-82.
[12]	Jin Xudong, Chen Zhongjian, Mao Weimin. Research progress on the role of MTAP in malignant mesothelioma [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(2): 99-104.
[13]	Huang Zhen, Chen Yongshun. Research progress of circulating tumor DNA in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(1): 59-64.
[14]	Wang Xiao, Li Ying, Luo Yujie, Jin Shu. Study on the prognostic value of serological indicators for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on nomogram model [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2023, 50(8): 463-469.
[15]	Liu Debao, Sun Ziwen, Lu Shoutang, Xu Haidong. Expression and clinical significance of ASB6 in colorectal cancer tissues [J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2023, 50(8): 470-474.