Effect of thoracic close drainage assisted by thin chest tube after video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy
FAN Kai-Jie-;Liu-Yang-;Yang-Bo-;Dai-Wei-Min-;Lin-Ji-Xing-;Chu-Xiang-Yang
2015, 42 (4):
245-248.
doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2015.04.002
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical effects of thoracic close drainage with thin drainage tube assisted to thick drainage tube after videoassisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 89 patients received VATS lobectomy in Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2014 to September 2014. The patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer were divided into two groups: treatment group (50 patients) and control group (39 patients). Treatment group took thin tube assisted to thick tube of thoracic close drainage and control group took general thoracic closed drainage tube. We studied the operation time, the bleeding of operation, the number of lymph node dissection, time of first activity out of bed,the hospitalization time of postoperation, postoperative complications, the days of postoperative drainage, drainage volume, the effect of drainage, the VAS evaluation score of postoperative pain in the two groups. ResultsCompared with control group, there was no statistical significance in the differences of the time of operation [(2.58±0.57) h vs (2.57±0.50) h; t=0.127, P=0.681], bleeding of operation [(108.00±52.84) ml vs (114.10±107.18) ml; t=0.352, P=0.334], the number of lymph node dissection [(14.20±5.95) vs (11.21±4.71); t=2.576, P=0.068)], the staying time of drainage [(5.66±2.53) d vs (5.82±2.02) d; t=0.324, P=0.219], the postoperative drainage volume [(1 141.76±819.26) ml vs (1 022.95±464.84) ml; t=0.889, P=0.367] and the occurrences of the postoperative complications (8.00% vs 10.25%; χ2=1.750, P=0.726). There was statistical significance in the differences of the postoperative time of offbed [(11.28±8.78) h vs (13.97±7.83) h; t=4.027, P=0.045], the time from surgery to discharge [(8.36±2.63) d vs (9.56±2.89) d; t=2.952, P=0.043] and the drainage effect(costophrenic angle sharp: 72.0% vs 46.2%; χ2=5.329, P=0.017). In the two groups, there were statistical significance differences in scores of VAS for the 24 to 72 hours resting and coughing of postoperation: 24 h [(2.78±1.13) vs (3.74±1.68); t=3.226, P<0.001)], 48 h [(1.98±0.59) vs (3.33±1.72); t=5.189, P<0.001)], 72 h [(1.94±0.55) vs (3.15±1.60); t=5.010, P<0.001)], coughing [(3.64±1.23) vs (5.33±1.95); t=5.005, P<0.001)]. ConclusionThe thin drainage tube assisted to thick drainage tube for thoracic close drainage make the drainage more effective, release the pain, shorten the hopital stay; moreover, it is simple and safe for operation and easy to popularize with high modified value.
References |
Related Articles |
Metrics
|