Clinical application of MR-guided radiotherapy based on MR-linac in esophageal cancer patients

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20230730-00004

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To explore the application process， efficacy and safety of MR-guided radiotherapy based on MR-linac in esophageal cancer. Methods The clinical data of patients with esophageal cancer treated with MR-linac at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute from September 2021 to July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed， to investigate the treatment process of esophageal cancer with MR-linac， and to analyze the efficacy and safety of patients. All patients received MR-guided radiotherapy， underwent CT and MR localization， target area delineation， and design of the Monaco treatment planning system plan. Adaptation-to-position adjustment was conducted during the pre-treatment evaluation. The median number of fractions was 25， the median single dose of planning target volume was 1.8 Gy， and the median total dose was 50.2 Gy. Median follow-up was 16 months. Results Among the 12 patients in the whole group， there were 1 case of cervical esophageal cancer， 3 cases of upper thoracic esophageal cancer， 4 cases of middle thoracic esophageal cancer and 4 cases of lower thoracic esophageal cancer， including 3 cases of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and 9 cases of radical radiotherapy. All patients had a smooth treatment process. The median treatment time was 33 min， and the patients had good compliance. For patients with radical radiotherapy， one month after radiotherapy， the number of objective remission cases was 3， and the number of disease-control cases was 9； six months after radiotherapy， the number of objective remission cases was 3， and the number of disease-control cases was 6. All patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy underwent surgery within 2 months， and one patient achieved pathological complete remission. The most common acute adverse reactions were radiation esophagitis （7 cases） and leukopenia in bone marrow suppression （8 cases）， with late-stage adverse reactions being radiation pneumonia （1 case）. The adverse reactions to radiotherapy were slight， and no grade 4 or above adverse reactions were observed. Conclusion The clinical treatment process for esophageal cancer under MR-guided radiotherapy based on MR-linac is feasible， with good curative effects and mild adverse reactions.

Key words: Esophageal neoplasms, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radiotherapy, image-guided, Treatment outcome

Gao Xinyu, Li Zhenjiang, Sun Hongfu, Han Dan, Zhao Qian, Liu Chengxin, Huang Wei. Clinical application of MR-guided radiotherapy based on MR-linac in esophageal cancer patients[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2024, 51(1): 37-42.

Figures/Tables 4

References 19

[1]	Miller KD, Nogueira L, Devasia T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2022[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2022, 72(5): 409-436. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21731.
[2]	de Crevoisier R, Lafond C, Mervoyer A, et al. Image-guided radiotherapy[J]. Cancer Radiother, 2022, 26(1/2): 34-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.08.002.
[3]	Hunt A, Hanson I, Dunlop A, et al. Feasibility of magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer[J]. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol, 2020, 25: 46-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.09.002. pmid: 33015380
[4]	中国医师协会放射肿瘤治疗医师分会, 中华医学会放射肿瘤治疗学分会, 中国抗癌协会肿瘤放射治疗专业委员会. 中国食管癌放射治疗指南(2022年版)[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 49(11): 641-657. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20221011-00129.
[5]	NCCN. Guidelines of esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2. 2022[EB/OL]. [2022-02-11].http://www.nccn.org.
[6]	Fischer-Valuck BW, Henke L, Green O, et al. Two-and-a-half-year clinical experience with the world's first magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy system[J]. Adv Radiat Oncol, 2017, 2(3): 485-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.05.006. pmid: 29114617
[7]	Mercieca S, Belderbos JSA, van Herk M. Challenges in the target volume definition of lung cancer radiotherapy[J]. Transl Lung Cancer Res, 2021, 10(4): 1983-1998. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-627.
[8]	Boekhoff MR, Defize IL, Borggreve AS, et al. 3-Dimensional target coverage assessment for MRI guided esophageal cancer radiotherapy[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2020, 147: 1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.007. pmid: 32234611
[9]	Menten MJ, Fast MF, Nill S, et al. Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with an MR-linac-quantifying the impact of the magnetic field and real-time tumor tracking[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2016, 119(3): 461-466. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.019.
[10]	Jin P, Hulshof MCCM, van Wieringen N, et al. Interfractional variability of respiration-induced esophageal tumor motion quantified using fiducial markers and four-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2017, 124(1): 147-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.05.015. pmid: 28579281
[11]	Lee SL, Bassetti M, Meijer GJ, et al. Review of MR-guided radiotherapy for esophageal cancer[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 628009. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.628009.
[12]	Boekhoff MR, Bouwmans R, Doornaert PAH, et al. Clinical implementation and feasibility of long-course fractionated MR-guided chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal cancer: an R-IDEAL stage 1b/2a evaluation of technical innovation[J]. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol, 2022, 34: 82-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.03.008. pmid: 35372703
[13]	Chen YJ, H Kernstine K, Shibata S, et al. Image-guided radiotherapy of esophageal cancer by helical tomotherapy: acute toxicity and preliminary clinical outcome[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2009, 1(1): 11-16. DOI: 10.3978/J.ISSN.2072-1439.2009.12.01.013.
[14]	Defize IL, Boekhoff MR, Borggreve AS, et al. Tumor volume regression during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a prospective study with weekly MRI[J]. Acta Oncol, 2020, 59(7): 753-759. DOI: 10.1080/0284186X.2020.1759819. pmid: 32400242
[15]	Heethuis SE, Borggreve AS, Goense L, et al. Quantification of variations in intra-fraction motion of esophageal tumors over the course of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy based on cine-MRI[J]. Phys Med Biol, 2018, 63(14): 145019. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aacfb5.
[16]	Fukada J, Shigematsu N, Takeuchi H, et al. Symptomatic pericardial effusion after chemoradiation therapy in esophageal cancer patients[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2013, 87(3): 487-493. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.008.
[17]	Tonison JJ, Fischer SG, Viehrig M, et al. Radiation pneumonitis after intensity-modulated radiotherapy for esophageal cancer: institutional data and a systematic review[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 2255. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-38414-5. pmid: 30783157
[18]	van Herk M, McWilliam A, Dubec M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy: a short strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2018, 101(5): 1057-1060. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.009.
[19]	Chuter RW, Whitehurst P, Choudhury A, et al. Technical note: investigating the impact of field size on patient selection for the 1.5T MR-linac[J]. Med Phys, 2017, 44(11): 5667-5671. DOI: 10.1002/mp.12557. pmid: 28869651

患者	年龄（岁）	性别	KPS评分（分）	肿瘤部位	肿瘤内镜长度（cm）	病理类型	TNM分期	处方剂量	GTV（cm³）	治疗模式
1	70.0	男	80	下段	4.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₃N₁M₀	1.8 Gy×23次	14.3	新辅助放疗
2	73.0	男	80	中段	5.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₃N₀M₀	2.0 Gy×30次	38.6	术后复发后放疗
3	71.0	女	90	颈段	8.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₄N₁M₁	2.0 Gy×30次	48.0	根治性放疗
4	54.0	男	90	下段	9.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₂N₂M₀	1.8 Gy×23次	85.9	根治性放疗
5	89.0	男	80	上段	8.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₃N₀M₀	1.8 Gy×28次	19.8	根治性放疗
6	49.0	男	90	下段	15.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₃N₀M₀	1.8 Gy×23次	67.2	新辅助放疗
7	46.0	男	90	下段	11.0	黑色素瘤	T₄N₃M₀	1.8 Gy×23次	81.7	新辅助放疗
8	73.0	男	90	中段	8.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₃N₁M₀	1.8 Gy×23次	39.1	根治性放疗
9	63.0	男	90	中段	15.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₃N₂M₁	2.0 Gy×28次	71.7	根治性放疗
10	82.0	男	80	中段	4.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₃N₀M₀	2.5 Gy×25次	6.0	根治性放疗
11	81.0	女	80	上段	8.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₃N₂M₀	1.8 Gy×30次	95.4	根治性放疗
12	70.0	男	90	上段	3.0	鳞状细胞癌	T₂N₂M₁	2.0 Gy×25次	6.5	根治性放疗

不良反应	级别					合计
不良反应	1	2	3	4	5	合计
放射性食管炎	7	0	0	0	0	7
放射性皮炎	2	0	0	0	0	2
白细胞计数减少	1	4	3	0	0	8
中性粒细胞计数减少	3	2	1	0	0	6
血小板计数减少	4	0	0	0	0	4
贫血	3	0	0	0	0	3