国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (7): 430-435.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20220602-00082
收稿日期:
2022-06-02
修回日期:
2022-06-08
出版日期:
2022-07-08
发布日期:
2022-09-19
通讯作者:
谢鹏
E-mail:xiepengro@126.com
基金资助:
Peng Chen1,2, Xie Yintong3, Zhang Xin4, Xie Peng2,5()
Received:
2022-06-02
Revised:
2022-06-08
Online:
2022-07-08
Published:
2022-09-19
Contact:
Xie Peng
E-mail:xiepengro@126.com
Supported by:
摘要:
宫颈癌是威胁女性生命健康的常见恶性肿瘤。其中复发或晚期宫颈癌预后较差,且往往接受过手术治疗、放疗、化疗等,在选择治疗方案时更加棘手,即使经过最有效的治疗手段,晚期宫颈癌治疗失败率仍较高。得益于肿瘤细胞信号通路相关靶点及免疫治疗,尤其是免疫检查点抑制剂的研究进展,宫颈癌维持治疗取得了新的突破。靶向维持治疗、免疫维持治疗、多药联合维持治疗是目前宫颈癌维持治疗的热门领域。
彭琛, 谢印通, 张昕, 谢鹏. 宫颈癌维持治疗研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2022, 49(7): 430-435.
Peng Chen, Xie Yintong, Zhang Xin, Xie Peng. Research progress of maintenance therapy for cervical cancer[J]. Journal of International Oncology, 2022, 49(7): 430-435.
[1] |
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 |
[2] |
Koh WJ, Abu-Rustum NR, Bean S, et al. Cervical Cancer, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2019, 17(1): 64-84. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0001 |
[3] |
Cibula D, Pötter R, Planchamp F, et al. The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2018, 127(3): 404-416. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.03.003.
doi: S0167-8140(18)30135-X pmid: 29728273 |
[4] |
Tewari KS, Sill MW, Long HJ 3rd, et al. Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(8): 734-743. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309748.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309748 |
[5] |
Leath CA 3rd, Straughn JM Jr. Chemotherapy for advanced and recurrent cervical carcinoma: results from cooperative group trials[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2013, 129(1): 251-257. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.035.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.035 |
[6] |
Tewari KS, Sill MW, Penson RT, et al. Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240)[J]. Lancet, 2017, 390(10103): 1654-1663. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31607-0.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31607-0 |
[7] |
Godoy-Ortiz A, Plata Y, Alcaide J, et al. Bevacizumab for recurrent, persistent or advanced cervical cancer: reproducibility of GOG 240 study results in “real world” patients[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2018, 20(7): 922-927. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1808-x.
doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1808-x pmid: 29222647 |
[8] |
Suzuki K, Nagao S, Shibutani T, et al. Phase Ⅱ trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 154(3): 554-557. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.018.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.05.018 |
[9] |
Zhu J, Song C, Zheng Z, et al. Anlotinib in Chinese patients with recurrent advanced cervical cancer: a prospective single-arm, open-label phase Ⅱ trial[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 720343. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.720343.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.720343 |
[10] |
Xia X, Jiang W, Qi W, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of apatinib for the treatment of patients with metastatic, recurrent cervical cancer after failure of radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy: a prospective study[J]. Oncol Res Treat, 2020, 43(12): 649-655. DOI: 10.1159/000510355.
doi: 10.1159/000510355 |
[11] |
Li N, Wang Z, Yuan G, et al. An oral small molecule VEGFR2 inhibitor, apatinib, in patients with recurrent or refractory cervical cancer: a real world study[J]. J Oncol, 2020, 2020: 3852373. DOI: 10.1155/2020/3852373.
doi: 10.1155/2020/3852373 |
[12] |
Xiao Y, Cheng H, Wang L, et al. Clinical response and safety of apatinib monotherapy in recurrent, metastatic cervical cancer after failure of chemotherapy: a retrospective study[J]. J Gynecol Oncol, 2020, 31(1): e2. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e2.
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e2 |
[13] |
Yang H, Chen M, Mei Z, et al. Effectiveness and prognostic factors of apatinib treatment in patients with recurrent or advanced cervical carcinoma: a retrospective study[J]. Cancer Med, 2021, 10(13): 4282-4290. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3966.
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3966 |
[14] |
Zhang L, Chen L, Yu H. Phase Ⅱ study of apatinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting tumor angiogenesis, as second-line treatment for recurrent or advanced cervical cancer patients[J]. Invest New Drugs, 2020, 38(4): 1186-1191. DOI: 10.1007/s10637-019-00858-5.
doi: 10.1007/s10637-019-00858-5 |
[15] |
de Bono JS, Concin N, Hong DS, et al. Tisotumab vedotin in patients with advanced or meta static solid tumours (InnovaTV 201): a first-in-human, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2019, 20(3): 383-393. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30859-3.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30859-3 |
[16] |
Coleman RL, Lorusso D, Gennigens C, et al. Efficacy and safety of tisotumab vedotin in previously treated recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (innovaTV 204/GOG-3023/ENGOT-cx6): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(5): 609-619. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00056-5.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00056-5 |
[17] | A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial of tisotumab vedotin vs investigator's choice chemotherapy in second- or third-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer[EB/OL]. [2021-2-22][2022-7-26]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04697628?term=NCT04697628&draw=2&rank=1. |
[18] |
Vergote IB, Concin N, Mirza MR, et al. 1064TiP—phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ trial of tisotumab vedotin plus bevacizumab, pembrolizumab, or carboplatin in recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (innovaTV 205/ENGOT-cx8)[J]. Ann Oncol, 2019, 30(Supplement 5): v433-v434. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz250.072.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz250.072 |
[19] | A phase 1b/2 open-label trial of tisotumab vedotin (HuMax®-TF-ADC) monotherapy and in combination with other agents in subjects with recurrent or stage ⅣB cervical cancer[EB/OL]. [2019-2-27] [2022-5-20]. https:/clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03786081?term=NCT03786081&draw=2&rank=1. |
[20] |
Benson R, Pathy S, Kumar L, et al. Locally advanced cervical cancer—neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation and targeted therapy as maintenance: a phase Ⅱ study[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2019, 15(6): 1359-1364. DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_39_18.
doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_39_18 pmid: 31898673 |
[21] |
Pignata S, Scambia G, Lorusso D, et al. The MITO CERV-2 trial: a randomized phase Ⅱ study of cetuximab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel, in advanced or recurrent cervical cancer[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2019, 153(3): 535-540. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.03.260.
doi: S0090-8258(19)30495-0 pmid: 30979589 |
[22] |
Carlson JJ, Italiano A, Brose MS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of larotrectinib and entrectinib for TRK fusion cancer[J]. Am J Manag Care, 2022, 28(2 Suppl): S26-S32. DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88845.
doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88845 |
[23] |
Thaker PH, Salani R, Brady WE, et al. A phase Ⅰ trial of paclitaxel, cisplatin, and veliparib in the treatment of persistent or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: an NRG Oncology Study (NCT#01281852)[J]. Ann Oncol, 2017, 28(3): 505-511. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw635.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw635 pmid: 27998970 |
[24] |
Frenel JS, Le Tourneau C, O'Neil B, et al. Safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab in advanced, programmed death ligand 1-positive cervical cancer: results from the phase Ⅰb KEYNOTE-028 trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2017, 35(36): 4035-4041. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.5471.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.5471 |
[25] |
Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase Ⅱ KEYNOTE-158 study[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(17): 1470-1478. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.01265.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01265 |
[26] |
Naumann RW, Hollebecque A, Meyer T, et al. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic cervical, vaginal, or vulvar carcinoma: results from the phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ CheckMate 358 trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2019, 37(31): 2825-2834. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.00739.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00739 pmid: 31487218 |
[27] |
Tewari KS, Monk BJ, Vergote I, et al. Survival with cemiplimab in recurrent cervical cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(6): 544-555. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112187.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112187 |
[28] | Prospective randomized phase Ⅱ trial comparing doxorubicin alone versus atezolizumab alone versus doxorubicin and atezolizumab in recurrent cervical cancer[EB/OL]. [2017-8-30] [2021-1-27]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03340376?term=NCT03340376&draw=2&rank=1. |
[29] |
Mayadev J, Nunes AT, Li M, et al. CALLA: efficacy and safety of concurrent and adjuvant durvalumab with chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in women with locally advanced cervical cancer: a phase Ⅲ, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2020, 30(7): 1065-1070. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001135.
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-001135 pmid: 32447296 |
[30] | Update on CALLA phase Ⅲ trial of concurrent use of imfinzi and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer[EB/OL]. [2022-3-24] [2022-5-20]. https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2022/update-on-calla-phase-iii-trial-for-im-finzi.html. |
[31] |
Lheureux S, Butler MO, Clarke B, et al. Association of ipili-mumab with safety and antitumor activity in women with metastatic or recurrent human papillomavirus-related cervical carcinoma[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2018, 4(7): e173776. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3776.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3776 |
[32] | A phase 2, multicenter, single arm, open label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AK104 in subjects with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer[EB/OL]. [2020-7-15] [2022-5-28]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04380805?term=NCT04380805&draw=2&rank=1. |
[33] | A multicenter, open-label, phase Ⅱ study of AK104(an anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer[EB/OL]. [2021-4-01] [2022-5-29]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04868708?term=NCT04868708&draw=2&rank=1. |
[34] | double-blind, placebo-controlled phase Ⅲ study to evaluate AK104 plus platinum-containing chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer[EB/OL]. [2021-8-27] [2022-4-27]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04982237?term=NCT04982237&draw=2&rank=1. |
[35] |
O'Malley DM, Oaknin A, Monk BJ, et al. LBA34 single-agent anti-PD-1 balstilimab or in combination with anti-CTLA-4 zalifrelimab for recurrent/metastatic (R/M) cervical cancer (CC): preliminary results of two independent phase Ⅱ trials[J]. Ann Oncol, 31(Supplement 4):S1164-S1165. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2264.
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.08.2264 |
[36] | Monk BJ, Tewari KS, Hasegawa CK, et al. Patient-reported outcomes from the phase 3 randomized, double-blind, KEYNOTE-826 trial of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer[R]. Phoenix: The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO)2022 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer, 2022. |
[37] |
Xu Q, Wang J, Sun Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus anlotinib for PD-L1-positive recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: a multicenter, single-arm, prospective phase Ⅱ trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2022, 40(16): 1795-1805. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.02091.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02091 |
[38] |
Lan C, Shen J, Wang Y, et al. Camrelizumab Plus apatinib in patients with advanced cervical cancer (CLAP): a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase Ⅱ trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(34): 4095-4106. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.01920.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01920 |
[39] |
Friedman CF, Snyder Charen A, Zhou Q, et al. Phase Ⅱ study of atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced cervical cancer[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2020, 8(2): e001126. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001126.
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001126 |
[1] | 陈红健, 张素青. 血清miR-24-3p、H2AFX与肝癌患者临床病理特征及术后复发的关系研究[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 344-349. |
[2] | 王盈, 刘楠, 郭兵. 抗体药物偶联物在转移性乳腺癌治疗中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(6): 364-369. |
[3] | 张宁宁, 杨哲, 檀丽梅, 李振宁, 王迪, 魏永志. 宫颈细胞DNA倍体分析联合B7-H4和PKCδ对宫颈癌的诊断价值[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(5): 286-291. |
[4] | 刘萍萍, 何学芳, 张翼, 杨旭, 张珊珊, 季一飞. 原发性脑胶质瘤患者术后复发危险因素及预测模型构建[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(4): 193-197. |
[5] | 李书月, 马辰莺, 周菊英, 徐晓婷, 秦颂兵. 寡转移非小细胞肺癌的放疗进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(3): 170-174. |
[6] | 孙国宝, 杨倩, 庄庆春, 高斌斌, 孙晓刚, 宋伟, 沙丹. 结直肠癌肝转移组织病理学生长方式研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2024, 51(2): 114-118. |
[7] | 张露, 蒋华, 林州, 马辰莺, 徐晓婷, 王利利, 周菊英. 免疫检查点抑制剂治疗复发转移性宫颈癌的疗效及预后分析[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(8): 475-483. |
[8] | 吕璐, 孙鹏飞. 肠道菌群与宫颈癌[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(6): 373-376. |
[9] | 杨丽蓉, 王羽丰. 预测浆液性卵巢癌术后复发远处转移风险机器学习模型的构建[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(4): 220-226. |
[10] | 李雄安, 颜艳艳. 丙戊酸镁用于治疗继发癫痫的晚期肺癌脑转移患者1例报道[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(3): 191-192. |
[11] | 马培晗, 张灵敏, 路宁, 张明鑫. 麻醉对肝细胞癌复发转移的影响[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 117-121. |
[12] | 段传菊, 陈真云, 李晓红, 牛洪朋, 李秀敏. 复发宫颈癌免疫治疗1例[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(12): 766-768. |
[13] | 吕璐, 孙鹏飞, 崔腾璐. 子宫内膜癌颈部淋巴结转移综合治疗1例并文献复习[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(11): 701-704. |
[14] | 马雪艳, 鲁历历, 孙鹏飞. 免疫微环境在宫颈癌中的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(1): 47-50. |
[15] | 赵建昊, 段衍超. 多发性骨髓瘤髓外病变发病机制的研究进展[J]. 国际肿瘤学杂志, 2023, 50(1): 55-59. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||