国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7): 395-399.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2018.07.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种改良根治术式治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱa期乳腺癌临床对比研究

邱涵,孔珺   

  1. 432000  湖北省荆州市中心医院乳腺科
  • 出版日期:2018-07-08 发布日期:2018-07-31
  • 通讯作者: 邱涵,Email: qiuhan83@126.com E-mail:qiuhan83@126.com

Clinical comparative study of two kinds of modified radical mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer patients for Ⅰ-Ⅱa stage

Qiu Han, Kong Jun   

  1. Department of Breast, Central Hospital of Jingzhou City,  Hubei Province, Jingzhou 432000, China
  • Online:2018-07-08 Published:2018-07-31
  • Contact: Qiu Han, Email: qiuhan83@126.com E-mail:qiuhan83@126.com

摘要: 目的  探讨常规与保留乳头乳晕改良根治术式治疗Ⅰ~Ⅱa期乳腺癌的疗效及安全性差异。方法  选取荆州市中心医院2011年10月至2013年10月收治的Ⅰ~Ⅱa期乳腺癌患者共100例,采用随机数字表法分为对照组(50例)和观察组(50例),分别采用常规与保留乳头乳晕改良根治术式。比较两组患者手术用时、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、手术美观性评分,乳腺癌患者生命质量测定量表(FACT-B)评分,术后并发症发生率,随访3年局部复发率、远处转移率及生存率。结果  观察组患者手术用时[(163.36±39.13)min∶(144.74±34.62)min]和术中出血量[(128.10±22.52)ml∶(114.32±18.89)ml]均显著多于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.10,P<0.001;t=2.87,P<0.001)。观察组和对照组患者淋巴结清扫数目比较差异无统计学意义[(15.19±3.38)个∶(14.68±3.14)个,t=0.61,P=0.480]。观察组患者随访6个月和12个月手术美观性评分均高于对照组(9.61±0.38∶7.28±0.84;9.32±0.46∶7.05±0.76),差异有统计学意义(t=3.22,P<0.001;t=3.51,P<0.001);观察组患者术后12个月社会/家庭状况评分(22.86±5.21∶19.23±4.38)、功能状况评分(15.85±3.18∶9.32±2.39)、情感状况评分(18.85±3.98∶15.32±2.39)及总分(95.73±14.16∶82.26±10.35)均显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.56,P<0.001;t=3.19,P<0.001;t=3.51,P<0.001;t=3.24,P<0.001)。观察组和对照组患者术后并发症发生率(24.00%∶16.00%)比较,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.00,P=0.320);同时两组患者随访3年局部复发率(0∶2.00%)、远处转移率(4.00%∶6.00%)比较,差异无统计学意义(P=1.000;χ2=0.00,P=1.000),两组患者的生存率均为100.00%。结论  相较于常规改良根治术式,保留乳头乳晕改良根治术式用于Ⅰ~Ⅱa期乳腺癌患者治疗可有效提高手术美观性,改善患者总体生命质量,且未增加远期复发转移风险。

关键词: 乳腺肿瘤, 外科手术, 生活质量, 手术后并发症

Abstract: Objective  To compare the clinical effects and safety of conventional modified radical mastectomy and modified radical mastectomy for reserved nipple areola in the treatment of breast cancer patients for Ⅰ-Ⅱa stage. Methods  One hundred breast cancer patients for Ⅰ-Ⅱa stage were chosen in the period from October 2011 to October 2013 in the central hospital of Jinzhou City and were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table: the control group (50 patients) with conventional modified radical mastectomy and the observation group (50 patients) with modified radical mastectomy for reserved nipple areola. The operation time, the intraoperative blood loss, the number of lymph node dissection, the surgical aesthetic score, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) score, the postoperative complication incidence, the 3 years follow-up of local recurrence rate, distant metastasis and survival rate in both groups were compared. Results  The operation time [(163.36±39.13)min vs. (144.74±34.62)min] and the intrao-perative blood loss [(128.10±22.52)ml vs. (114.32±18.89)ml] of the observation group were significantly higher than the control group, with significant differences (t=3.10, P<0.001; t=2.87, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissection between the two groups [(15.19±3.38) vs. (14.68±3.14), t=0.61, P=0.480]. The surgical aesthetic score in 6 months [(9.61±0.38) vs. (7.28±0.84)] and 12 months [(9.32±0.46) vs. (7.05±0.76)]  after operation of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group (t=3.22, P<0.001; t=3.51, P<0.001). The social/family status score [(22.86±5.21) vs. (19.23±4.38)], functional status score [(15.85±3.18) vs. (9.32±2.39)], emotional status score  [(18.85±3.98) vs. (15.32±2.39)] and total score [(95.73±14.16) vs. (82.26±10.35)] of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group (t=3.56, P<0.001; t=3.19, P<0.001; t=3.51, P<0.001; t=3.24, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the postoperative complication incidence (24.00% vs. 16.00%) between the two groups (χ2=1.00, P=0.320). There were no significant differences in the local recurrence rate (0 vs. 2.00%) and the distant metastasis (4.00% vs. 6.00%) in 3 years followup between the two groups (P=1.000; χ2=0.00, P=1.000). The survival rates of the two groups were both 100.00%. Conclusion  Compared with conventional modified radical mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy for reserved nipple areola in the treatment of breast cancer patients for I-IIa stage can efficiently improve the surgical aesthetics, the overall quality of life and cannot increase the risk of longterm recurrence and metastasis.

Key words: Breast neoplasms, Surgical procedures, Quality of life, Postoperative complications