Journal of International Oncology ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 689-694.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20250507-00118

• Original article • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on dose optimization strategy of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on the inner edge tangent field for the target area after breast-conserving surgery for left-sided breast cancer

Zhao Biao1, Zhu Yupu1, Zhang Yating1, Yuan Meifang1, Li Han1, Yang Yi1, Sun Chaoxi2()   

  1. 1Department of Radiotherapy, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming 650118, China
    2Department of Critical Care Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming 650118, China
  • Received:2025-05-07 Revised:2025-07-06 Online:2025-11-08 Published:2025-12-21
  • Contact: Sun Chaoxi E-mail:sunchaoxi1201@126.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(32360114)

Abstract:

Objective To explore the dose optimization strategy of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (dIMRT) based on the inner edge tangential field (IETF) for the target area after breast-conserving surgery for left-sided breast cancer. Methods The localization CT and target organ at risk (OAR) data of 36 patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in the Department of Radiotherapy of Yunnan Cancer Hospital from August 2023 to October 2024 were retrospectively selected. Two dIMRT schedules, conventional tangential field (CTF)-dIMRT and IETF-dIMRT, were designed for each patient; The target dose and the OAR dose of the two groups were counted and analyzed. Results For CTF-dIMRT and IETF-dIMRT, the D98% of the target area were (47.36±0.88) and (47.61±0.81) Gy, and the D50% were (52.08±0.23) and (52.01±0.22) Gy, the conformity index (CI) were 0.82±0.03 and 0.84±0.03, with statistically significant differences (t=-3.45, P=0.001; t=2.28, P=0.029; t=-6.24, P<0.001). The D2% were (53.83±0.33) and (53.89±0.42) Gy, the homogeneity index (HI) were 0.12±0.02 and 0.12±0.02, with no statistically significant difference (t=-1.11, P=0.276; t=1.89, P=0.067). For CTF-dIMRT and IETF-dIMRT, the V5 of left lung were (35.40±7.77) % and (31.44±6.01) %, the V20 were (12.69±2.84) % and (11.48±2.22) %, the Dmean were (8.15±1.42) and (7.39±1.13) Gy, with statistically significant differences (t=6.92, P<0.001; t=6.79, P<0.001; t=9.10, P<0.001). The heart Dmean were (4.99±1.15) and (4.29±1.00) Gy, the right lung Dmean were (1.24±0.12) and (1.15±0.11) Gy, the right breast Dmean were (2.34±1.01) and (3.26±1.54) Gy, the spinal cord D2 were (1.26±0.13) and (1.22±0.12) Gy, with statistically significant differences (t=7.88, P<0.001; t=6.66, P<0.001; t=-6.85, P<0.001; t=2.76, P=0.009). Conclusions Both IETF-dIMRT and CTF-dIMRT can fully meet clinical requirements. Compared with CTF-dIMRT, IETF-dIMRT after breast-conserving surgery for left-sided breast cancer has more benefits in terms of target dose and OAR protection.

Key words: Unilateral breast neoplasms, Radiotherapy, intensity-modulated, Radiation dosage, Conventional tangential field, Inner edge tangential field