Journal of International Oncology ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (11): 660-665.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20210607-00131

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical study of intraperitoneal infusion of bevacizumab combined with albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin in carcinomatous peritoneal adhesion from ovarian cancer

Zheng Jing1, Yao Sheng2, Shen Wenjie3, Sun Zhijia1, Zhao Hui1, Fu Yan1, Gao Ke1, Du Nan1()   

  1. 1Department of Oncology, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
    2Department of General Surgery, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA Genera Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
    3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fourth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100048, China
  • Received:2021-06-07 Revised:2021-10-01 Online:2021-11-08 Published:2021-12-14
  • Contact: Du Nan E-mail:dunan304@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project(Z171100000417011)

Abstract:

Objective To observe the clinical effects of intraperitoneal perfusion of bevacizumab combined with albumin paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of malignant peritoneal adhesion caused by ovarian cancer. Methods From January 2016 to December 2020, 54 patients treated in our hospital with malignant peritoneal adhesions caused by ovarian cancer were enrolled in this study. They were randomly divided into experimental group (n=27) and control group (n=27) according to the random number table method. The treatment regimen of the experimental group was intravenous infusion of albumin paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal infusion of carboplatin and bevacizumab. The treatment regimen of the control group was intra-venous infusion of albumin paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal infusion of carboplatin. The treatment was repeated every 21 days, and the therapeutic effect was evaluated every two cycles. The treatment lasted for six cycles. The efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The remission rate of incomplete malignant bowel obstruction of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group [85.19% (23/27) vs. 59.26% (16/27)], the total effective rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group [74.07% (20/27) vs. 44.44% (12/27)], and there were statistically significant differences (χ2=4.523, P=0.033; χ 2=4.909, P=0.027). After treatment, the levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in ascites of the experimental group and the control group were significantly lower than those before treatment [(80.33±1.41) pg/ml vs. (310.45±3.35) pg/ml, t=449.884, P<0.001; (135.68±1.60) pg/ml vs. (310.46±3.09) pg/ml, t=499.281, P<0.001], and after treatment, the VEGF level in the experimental group decreased more significantly than that in the control group (t=-134.907, P<0.001). Patients in the experimental group and the control group tolerated the treatment well, and there were no significant differences in the incidences of adverse reactions such as hypertension (11.11% vs. 3.70%, χ2=0.270, P=0.603), neutropenia (14.81% vs. 11.11%, χ 2<0.001, P>0.999), peripheral neuropathy (3.70% vs. 0, χ2<0.001, P>0.999), diarrhea (7.41% vs. 3.70%, χ2<0.001, P>0.999), nausea (3.70% vs. 0, χ2<0.001, P>0.999), epistaxis (7.41% vs. 0, χ2=0.519, P=0.471) or albuminuria (3.70% vs. 0, χ 2<0.001, P>0.999) between the two groups. Conclusion Intraperitoneal perfusion of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy is superior to simple chemotherapy in the treatment of malignant peritoneal adhesion caused by ovarian cancer.

Key words: Ovarian neoplasms, Angiogenesis inhibitors, Peritoneal adhesion, Malignant bowel obstruction, Bevacizumab