国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (11): 689-694.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20250507-00118

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

左侧乳腺癌保乳术后基于靶区内缘切线野dIMRT剂量优化策略的研究

赵彪1, 朱俞朴1, 张雅婷1, 袁美芳1, 李瀚1, 杨毅1, 孙朝细2()   

  1. 1昆明医科大学第三附属医院 云南省肿瘤医院 北京大学肿瘤医院云南医院放射治疗科,昆明 650118
    2昆明医科大学第三附属医院 云南省肿瘤医院 北京大学肿瘤医院云南医院重症医学科,昆明 650118
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-07 修回日期:2025-07-06 出版日期:2025-11-08 发布日期:2025-12-21
  • 通讯作者: 孙朝细 E-mail:sunchaoxi1201@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(32360114)

Study on dose optimization strategy of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on the inner edge tangent field for the target area after breast-conserving surgery for left-sided breast cancer

Zhao Biao1, Zhu Yupu1, Zhang Yating1, Yuan Meifang1, Li Han1, Yang Yi1, Sun Chaoxi2()   

  1. 1Department of Radiotherapy, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming 650118, China
    2Department of Critical Care Medicine, Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Yunnan Cancer Hospital, Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, Kunming 650118, China
  • Received:2025-05-07 Revised:2025-07-06 Online:2025-11-08 Published:2025-12-21
  • Contact: Sun Chaoxi E-mail:sunchaoxi1201@126.com
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(32360114)

摘要:

目的 探究左侧乳腺癌保乳术后基于靶区内缘切线野(IETF)动态调强放疗(dIMRT)的剂量优化策略。方法 回顾性选取2023年8月至2024年10月收治于云南省肿瘤医院放疗科的36例左侧乳腺癌保乳术后放疗患者的定位CT和靶区危及器官(OAR)等资料,为每例患者分别设计常规切线野(CTF)和基于靶区IETF两种dIMRT计划(CTF-dIMRT和IETF-dIMRT);统计两种计划的靶区剂量和OAR剂量并进行数据分析。结果 CTF-dIMRT和IETF-dIMRT两种放疗计划靶区的D98%分别为(47.36±0.88)、(47.61±0.81) Gy,D50%分别为(52.08±0.23)、(52.01±0.22) Gy,适形指数(CI)分别为0.82±0.03、0.84±0.03,差异均有统计学意义(t=-3.45,P=0.001;t=2.28,P=0.029;t=-6.24,P<0.001);D2%分别为(53.83±0.33)、(53.89±0.42)Gy,均匀性指数(HI)分别为0.12±0.02、0.12±0.02,差异均无统计学意义(t=-1.11,P=0.276;t=1.89,P=0.067)。CTF-dIMRT和IETF-dIMRT两种放疗计划左肺V5分别为(35.40±7.77)%、(31.44±6.01)%,V20分别为(12.69±2.84)%、(11.48±2.22)%,Dmean分别为(8.15±1.42)、(7.39±1.13) Gy,差异均有统计学意义(t=6.92,P<0.001;t=6.79,P<0.001;t=9.10,P<0.001);心脏Dmean分别为(4.99±1.15)、(4.29±1.00) Gy,右肺Dmean分别为(1.24±0.12)、(1.15±0.11) Gy,右乳Dmean分别为(2.34±1.01)、(3.26±1.54) Gy,脊髓D2分别为(1.26±0.13)、(1.22±0.12) Gy,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.88,P<0.001;t=6.66,P<0.001;t=-6.85,P<0.001;t=2.76,P=0.009)。结论 IETF-dIMRT和CTF-dIMRT两种计划均能充分满足临床要求,相较于CTF-dIMRT,左侧乳腺癌保乳术后IETF-dIMRT在靶区剂量和OAR保护方面均有更多的获益。

关键词: 单侧乳腺肿瘤, 放射疗法,调强适形, 辐射剂量, 常规切线野, 内缘切线野

Abstract:

Objective To explore the dose optimization strategy of dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (dIMRT) based on the inner edge tangential field (IETF) for the target area after breast-conserving surgery for left-sided breast cancer. Methods The localization CT and target organ at risk (OAR) data of 36 patients with left-sided breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in the Department of Radiotherapy of Yunnan Cancer Hospital from August 2023 to October 2024 were retrospectively selected. Two dIMRT schedules, conventional tangential field (CTF)-dIMRT and IETF-dIMRT, were designed for each patient; The target dose and the OAR dose of the two groups were counted and analyzed. Results For CTF-dIMRT and IETF-dIMRT, the D98% of the target area were (47.36±0.88) and (47.61±0.81) Gy, and the D50% were (52.08±0.23) and (52.01±0.22) Gy, the conformity index (CI) were 0.82±0.03 and 0.84±0.03, with statistically significant differences (t=-3.45, P=0.001; t=2.28, P=0.029; t=-6.24, P<0.001). The D2% were (53.83±0.33) and (53.89±0.42) Gy, the homogeneity index (HI) were 0.12±0.02 and 0.12±0.02, with no statistically significant difference (t=-1.11, P=0.276; t=1.89, P=0.067). For CTF-dIMRT and IETF-dIMRT, the V5 of left lung were (35.40±7.77) % and (31.44±6.01) %, the V20 were (12.69±2.84) % and (11.48±2.22) %, the Dmean were (8.15±1.42) and (7.39±1.13) Gy, with statistically significant differences (t=6.92, P<0.001; t=6.79, P<0.001; t=9.10, P<0.001). The heart Dmean were (4.99±1.15) and (4.29±1.00) Gy, the right lung Dmean were (1.24±0.12) and (1.15±0.11) Gy, the right breast Dmean were (2.34±1.01) and (3.26±1.54) Gy, the spinal cord D2 were (1.26±0.13) and (1.22±0.12) Gy, with statistically significant differences (t=7.88, P<0.001; t=6.66, P<0.001; t=-6.85, P<0.001; t=2.76, P=0.009). Conclusions Both IETF-dIMRT and CTF-dIMRT can fully meet clinical requirements. Compared with CTF-dIMRT, IETF-dIMRT after breast-conserving surgery for left-sided breast cancer has more benefits in terms of target dose and OAR protection.

Key words: Unilateral breast neoplasms, Radiotherapy, intensity-modulated, Radiation dosage, Conventional tangential field, Inner edge tangential field