国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11): 661-664.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2018.11.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

再程放疗联合替吉奥治疗局部复发食管癌的临床疗效及安全性

顾祥,陈小军,宋文博,赵蓉蓉,王阿丽,褚俊峰   

  1. 225200江苏省扬州市江都人民医院放疗科
  • 出版日期:2018-11-08 发布日期:2018-12-21
  • 通讯作者: 褚俊峰,Email: jdcjf@sina.com E-mail:jdcjf@sina.com

Clinical efficacy and safety of re-radiotherapy combined with tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule in treatment of local recurrent esophageal carcinoma

Gu Xiang, Chen Xiaojun, Song Wenbo, Zhao Rongrong, Wang Ali, Chu Junfeng   

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Jiangdu People′s Hospital of Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, Yangzhou 225200, China
  • Online:2018-11-08 Published:2018-12-21
  • Contact: Chu Junfeng, Email: jdcjf@sina.com E-mail:jdcjf@sina.com

摘要: 目的 探讨再程放疗联合替吉奥治疗局部复发食管癌的疗效和安全性。方法 回顾性分析2012年1月1日至2015年6月30日扬州市江都人民医院收治的首程放疗后局部复发的食管癌患者63例,根据治疗方法不同进行分组,再程放疗联合替吉奥治疗27例为研究组,单纯再程放疗治疗36例为对照组,比较分析两组患者的临床疗效及不良反应。结果 研究组和对照组的治疗客观有效率分别为77.8%(21/27)和50.0%(18/36),两组差异具有统计学意义(χ2=5.048,P=0.025)。研究组和对照组患者的中位生存时间分别为21.6个月和13.7个月,研究组1年生存率(74.1%)和2年生存率(44.4%)均高于对照组(分别为52.8%和30.6%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=6.086,P=0.013)。研究组和对照组两组患者治疗期间的主要不良反应为放射性食管炎(92.6%∶80.5%)、放射性肺炎(18.5%∶19.4%)、骨髓抑制(96.3%∶77.8%)及消化道反应(25.9%∶19.4%),多为1~2级,其发生率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=0.975,P=0.323;χ2=0.009,P=0.926;χ2=2.941,P=0.086;χ2=0.375,P=0.540)。结论 再程放疗联合替吉奥治疗可提高局部复发食管癌的疗效,延长患者生存期,且不良反应可耐受。

关键词: 食管肿瘤, 放射疗法, 调强适形, 复发, 替吉奥

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of re-radiotherapy combined with TS-1 (tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule) in treatment of local recurrent esophageal carcinoma. MethodsA total of 63 esophageal carcinoma patients who recurred after the first course radiation treatment admitted to Jiangdu People′s Hospital of Yangzhou during January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2015 were retrospec-tively analyzed. Twenty-seven of them treated with re-radiotherapy combined with TS-1 were deemed as the research group and 36 of them treated with radiotherapy alone were deemed as the control group based on different treatment. Then the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. ResultsThe objective response rates were 77.8% (21/27) and 50.0% (18/36) respectively in the research group and control group, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=5.048, P=0.025). The median survival time in the two groups were 21.6 months and 13.7 months, the 1-year (74.1%) and 2-year (44.4%) survival rates of the research group were both higher than those of the control group (52.8% and 30.6%, respectively), and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=6.086, P=0.013). The major adverse effects of the research group and control group during the treatment were radiation oesophagitis (92.6% vs. 80.5%), radiation pneumonia (18.5% vs. 19.4%), myelosuppression (96.3% vs. 77.8%) and gastrointestinal reactions (25.9% vs. 19.4%). Most of them were 1-2 grade, and there were no statistically significant differences (χ2=0.975, P=0.323; χ2=0.009, P=0.926; χ2=2.941, P=0.086; χ2=0.375, P=0.540). ConclusionThe treatment of re-radiotherapy combined with TS-1 for local recurrent esophageal carcinoma can improve the efficacy and prolong survival period, and the adverse reactions are tolerable.

Key words: Esophageal neoplasms, Radiotherapy, intensity-modulated, Recurrence, Tegafur gimeracil oteracil potassium capsule