国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (11): 649-654.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20210409-00129

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

卡瑞利珠单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇二线治疗晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的疗效和安全性

张玉萍, 吴德平()   

  1. 皖西卫生职业学院附属医院肿瘤科,六安 237005
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-09 修回日期:2021-08-20 出版日期:2021-11-08 发布日期:2021-12-14
  • 通讯作者: 吴德平 E-mail:3148027179@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金(320.6750.2020-10-72)

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with albumin paclitaxel as second-line therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Zhang Yuping, Wu Deping()   

  1. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational College, Lu'an 237005, China
  • Received:2021-04-09 Revised:2021-08-20 Online:2021-11-08 Published:2021-12-14
  • Contact: Wu Deping E-mail:3148027179@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    Wu Jieping Medical Foundation(320.6750.2020-10-72)

摘要:

目的 评价卡瑞利珠单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇二线治疗晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的疗效和安全性。方法 研究对象为2019年5月12日至2020年8月20日皖西卫生职业学院附属医院肿瘤科收治的一线治疗失败的晚期或转移性ESCC患者72例,根据患者意愿分别给予卡瑞利珠单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇(试验组,n=45)或二线化疗(多西他赛或伊立替康,对照组,n=27)。分析患者的客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、不良事件发生率、总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)。结果 试验组和对照组ORR分别为26.7%(12/45)、7.4%(2/27),差异有统计学意义(χ2=3.996,P=0.046);DCR分别为48.9%(22/45)、29.6%(8/27),差异无统计学意义(χ2=2.575,P=0.109)。在不良事件方面,试验组患者耐受性更好,3级及以上不良事件发生率更低[28.9%(13/45) vs. 55.6%(15/27)],较对照组减少了48%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.049,P=0.025)。对照组有1例患者发生了与治疗相关的死亡。试验组中位OS为8.9个月(95%CI为7.9~9.8),对照组中位OS为6.5个月(95%CI为5.6~7.3),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5.068,P=0.024)。试验组中位PFS为2.2个月(95%CI为1.6~2.7),对照组中位PFS为1.8个月(95%CI为1.5~2.0),差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.799,P=0.028)。结论 卡瑞利珠单抗联合白蛋白紫杉醇二线治疗晚期ESCC患者的疗效确切,安全性可耐受,可能成为晚期ESCC二线治疗的潜在方案。

关键词: 食管肿瘤, 卡瑞利珠单抗, 治疗结果

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with albumin paclitaxel in second-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Seventy-two patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC who had failed first-line treatment admitted to the Department of Oncology of the Affiliated Hospital of West Anhui Health Vocational College from May 12, 2019 to August 20, 2020 were enrolled. The patients were given camrelizumab combined with albumin paclitaxel (the experimental group, n=45) or second-line chemotherapy (docetaxel or irinotecan, the control group, n=27) according to patients' preference. Besides, the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), incidence of adverse events, overall survival (OS) and progress free survival (PFS) were assessed. Results The ORR of the experimental group and the control group were 26.7% (12/45) and 7.4% (2/27) respectively, with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=3.996, P=0.046). The DCR of the two groups were 48.9% (22/45) and 29.6% (8/27) respectively, with no statistically significant difference (χ 2=2.575, P=0.109). In terms of adverse events, the experimental group was better tolerated, and the incidence of grade 3 or above adverse events was lower [28.9% (13/45) vs. 55.6% (15/27)], which was 48% lower than that of the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=5.049, P=0.025). One patient in the control group had a treatment-related death. The median OS was 8.9 months (95%CI: 7.9-9.8) in the experimental group and 6.5 months (95%CI: 5.6-7.3) in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=5.068, P=0.024). The median PFS was 2.2 months (95%CI: 1.6-2.7) in the experimental group and 1.8 months (95%CI: 1.5-2.0) in the control group, with a statistically significant difference (χ 2=4.799, P=0.028). Conclusion Camrelizumab combined with albumin paclitaxel in second-line treatment of advanced ESCC patients has proven efficacy and tolerable safety, which may be a potential second-line treatment for advanced ESCC.

Key words: Esophageal neoplasms, Camrelizumab, Treatment outcome