国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (4): 198-203.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20230515-00033

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血清TGF-β1、VEGF水平对非小细胞肺癌患者单孔胸腔镜根治术后复发的预测价值

王昆, 周中新(), 臧其威   

  1. 徐州医科大学附属医院心胸外科,徐州 221000
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-15 修回日期:2024-03-05 出版日期:2024-04-08 发布日期:2024-05-10
  • 通讯作者: 周中新,Email:zzxgqh@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生健康委高层次拔尖人才科研项目(LGY2020072)

Predictive value of serum TGF-β1 and VEGF levels in patients with non-small cell lung cancer after single-port thoracoscopic radical resection

Wang Kun, Zhou Zhongxin(), Zang Qiwei   

  1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221000, China
  • Received:2023-05-15 Revised:2024-03-05 Online:2024-04-08 Published:2024-05-10
  • Contact: Zhou Zhongxin, Email:zzxgqh@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Jiangsu Provincial Health Commission High-level Talents Research Project(LGY2020072)

摘要:

目的 分析血清转化生长因子β1(TGF-β1)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)对非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者单孔胸腔镜根治术后复发的预测价值。方法 选取徐州医科大学附属医院2018年5月至2020年5月就诊的50例行单孔胸腔镜根治术治疗的NSCLC患者为研究对象,比较手术前后血清TGF-β1、VEGF水平、Karnofsky功能状态(KPS)评分,统计并发症总发生率。对所有研究对象进行为期3年的随访,比较复发组与未复发组、存活组与死亡组患者的血清TGF-β1、VEGF水平及KPS评分,采用Pearson相关分析探讨TGF-β1、VEGF与KPS评分的相关性。绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,计算曲线下面积(AUC),评估血清TGF-β1、VEGF单独及联合检测对NSCLC患者单孔胸腔镜根治术后复发的预测价值。结果 50例NSCLC患者单孔胸腔镜根治术后1个月血清TGF-β1水平为(7.16±1.94)μg/L、VEGF水平为(42.26±5.04)ng/L,均低于术前的(13.62±3.52)μg/L、(136.52±20.66)ng/L(t=11.37,P<0.001;t=31.34,P<0.001);术后1个月KPS评分为(66.57±8.11)分,高于术前的(53.62±5.62)分(t=9.28,P<0.001)。50例患者术后1例发生切口延迟愈合、1例肺部感染,无肺栓塞等其他并发症发生,并发症总发生率为4.00%。复发组(n=6)患者的血清TGF-β1水平为(12.95±4.26)μg/L、VEGF水平为(72.46±6.05)ng/L,均高于未复发组(n=44)的(6.37±1.25)μg/L、(38.14±5.37)ng/L(t=8.34,P<0.001;t=29.99,P<0.001);复发组患者的KPS评分为(52.16±8.16)分,低于未复发组的(67.55±12.67)分(t=2.88,P=0.006)。死亡组(n=5)患者的血清TGF-β1水平为(13.99±6.82)μg/L、VEGF水平为(75.95±9.05)ng/L,均高于存活组(n=45)的(6.41±3.06)μg/L、(38.52±8.37)ng/L(t=4.56,P<0.001;t=21.47,P<0.001);死亡组患者的KPS评分为(1.25±0.34)分,低于存活组的(65.11±12.94)分(t=10.93,P<0.001)。Pearson相关分析显示,血清TGF-β1(r=-0.45,P<0.001)、VEGF(r=-0.48,P<0.001)水平均与KPS评分呈负相关。ROC曲线分析显示,TGF-β1最佳截断取值8.14 µg/L时,对单孔胸腔镜根治术后复发预测的AUC为0.516(95%CI为0.446~0.676),敏感性为71.85%,特异性为80.69%;VEGF最佳截断取值142 ng/L时,AUC为0.659(95%CI为0.534~0.761),敏感性为76.04%,特异性为82.52%;两者联合检测的AUC为0.828(95%CI为0.786~0.951),敏感性为91.86%,特异性为87.52%;两者联合检测的AUC优于TGF-β1、VEGF单独检测(Z=2.63,P=0.007;Z=2.32,P=0.013)。结论 NSCLC患者行单孔胸腔镜根治术治疗1个月后,血清TGF-β1、VEGF水平明显降低,两者联合检测对单孔胸腔镜根治术后复发具有较高的预测价值。

关键词: 转化生长因子β1, 血管内皮生长因子, 癌, 非小细胞肺, 治疗结果, 单孔胸腔镜根治术

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the predictive value of serum transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after single-port thoracoscopic radical resection. Methods A total of 50 patients with NSCLC who underwent single-port thoracoscopic radical resection in Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from May 2018 to May 2020 were selected as the observation objects. Serum TGF-β1, VEGF levels and Karnofsky functional status (KPS) scores before and after surgery were compared, and the total incidence of complications was calculated. All subjects were followed up for 3 years, and serum levels of TGF-β1, VEGF and KPS scores were compared between relapsed group and non-relapsed group, survival group and death group. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between TGF-β1, VEGF and KPS scores. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the predictive value of serum TGF-β1 and VEGF alone and combined detection in patients with NSCLC after single-port thoracoscopic radical resection. Results The serum levels of TGF-β1 and VEGF were (7.16±1.94) μg/L and (42.26±5.04) ng/L in 50 patients with NSCLC one month after single-port thoracoscopic radical resection, which were lower than those before surgery [(13.62±3.52) μg/L and (136.52±20.66) ng/L, t=11.37, P<0.001; t=31.34, P<0.001]. The KPS score one month after surgery was 66.57±8.11, which was higher than that before surgery (53.62±5.62, t=9.28, P<0.001). Postoperative wound healing was delayed in 1 of the 50 patients, pulmonary infection in 1 patient, and no pulmonary embolism and other complications occurred. The total incidence of complications was 4.00%. The serum levels of TGF-β1 and VEGF in patients in the relapsed group (n=6) were (12.95±4.26) μg/L and (72.46±6.05) ng/L respectively, which were higher than those in the non-relapsed group (n=44) [(6.37±1.25) μg/L and (38.14±5.37) ng/L; t=8.34, P<0.001; t=29.99, P<0.001]. The KPS score in the relapsed group was 52.16±8.16, which was lower than that in the non-relapsed group (67.55±12.67, t=2.88, P=0.006). Serum levels of TGF-β1 and VEGF in the death group (n=5) were (13.99±6.82) μg/L and (75.95±9.05) ng/L, which were higher than those in the survival group (n=45) [(6.41±3.06) μg/L and (38.52±8.37) ng/L; t=4.56,P<0.001; t=21.47, P<0.001]. The KPS score in the death group was 1.25±0.34, which was lower than that in the survival group (65.11±12.94, t=10.93, P<0.001). Pearson correlation analysis showed that serum levels of TGF-β1 (r=-0.45, P<0.001) and VEGF (r=-0.48, P<0.001) were negatively correlated with KPS scores. ROC curve analysis showed that when the optimal cut-off value of TGF-β1 was 8.14 µg/L, the AUC for predicting recurrence after single-port thoracoscopic radical resection was 0.516 (95%CI:0.446-0.676), the sensitivity was 71.85%, and the specificity was 80.69%. When the optimal cut-off value of VEGF was 142 ng/L, the AUC was 0.659 (95%CI:0.534-0.761), the sensitivity was 76.04%, and the specificity was 82.52%. The AUC of the combined detection was 0.828 (95%CI:0.786-0.951), the sensitivity was 91.86%, and the specificity was 87.52%. The AUC of combined detection was higher than that of serum TGF-β1 (Z=2.63,P=0.007), VEGF(Z=2.32,P=0.013) single detection. Conclusion The serum levels of TGF-β1 and VEGF are significantly decreased in NSCLC patients after one month of single-port thoracoscopic radical resection, and the combined detection of the two has predictive value for recurrence after single-port thoracoscopic radical resection.

Key words: Transforming growth factor beta1, Vascular endothelial growth factors, Carcinoma, non-small-cell lung, Treatment outcome, Single-port thoracoscopic radical surgery