国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 22-26.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2019.01.005

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

放大内镜联合窄带成像与超声内镜判断早期食管癌浸润深度准确性的对比研究

吴大鹏,孙仁虎,李杨,韩树堂,肖君   

  1. 南京中医药大学附属医院(江苏省中医院)消化内镜中心210029
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-06 出版日期:2019-01-08 发布日期:2019-04-03
  • 通讯作者: 肖君 E-mail:cutujun@aliyun.com
  • 基金资助:

    江苏省“333工程”培养资金(BRA2017551)

Comparison of magnifying endoscopy combined with narrowband imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography for assessment of the invasion depth of early esophageal cancer

Wu Dapeng, Sun Renhu, Li Yang, Han Shutang, Xiao Jun   

  1. Gastroenterology Endoscopy Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2018-09-06 Online:2019-01-08 Published:2019-04-03
  • Contact: Xiao Jun E-mail:cutujun@aliyun.com
  • Supported by:

    Jiangsu Province “333 Project” Training Fund (BRA2017551)

摘要: 目的 评价放大内镜联合窄带成像(ME-NBI)与超声内镜(EUS)在判断早期食管癌浸润深度方面的临床价值。方法 收集2017年1月至2018年5月江苏省中医院胃镜+病理诊断的早期食管癌患者68例,术前先后行ME-NBI和EUS分别判断病变浸润深度,参照术后病理,分别计算两者的准确性,并通过配对四格表χ2检验(McNemar检验)及Kappa检验进行比较。结果 术后病理示病灶局限于黏膜层至黏膜下层浅层(m-sm1层)病例57例,突破黏膜下层浅层(sm2-sm3)11例。ME-NBI和EUS对病变术前的评估结果分别与术后病理对照,MENBI与术后病理中度一致(McNemar检验P=0.508;Kappa=0.560,P<0.001),EUS与病理一致性不佳(McNemar检验P=0.019;Kappa=0.266,P=0.015)。ME-NBI和EUS对于早期食管癌浸润深度诊断的总准确率分别为86.8%(59/68)和72.1%(49/68),差异有统计学意义(McNemar检验P=0.015;Kappa=0.258,P=0.026)。结论 ME-NBI与EUS有助于早期食管癌浸润层次的判断,前者准确性更高,对患者手术方案的制定有较高的价值。

关键词: 食管肿瘤, 腔内超声检查, 肿瘤侵润, 放大内镜联合窄带成像

Abstract: Objective To investigate the clinical utility of magnifying endoscopy combined with narrowband imaging (ME-NBI) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in predicting the depth of early esophageal cancer. Methods Sixtyeight patients with early esophageal cancer after gastroscopic and pathological diagnosis were enrolled in Jiangsu Provincal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2017 to May 2018, ME-NBI and EUS were performed preoperatively to determine the depth of lesion infiltration respectively, the accuracies of the two methods were calculated by referring to the postoperative pathology, and the McNemar test and Kappa test were used for comparison. Results The lesion confined to shallow mucosa and submucosa superficial layer was confirmed in 57 patients by postoperative pathology, submucosa superficial below in 11 patients. Compared with that of histology, the ability of assessment of the invasion depth was moderately consistent with MENBI (McNemar test P=0.508; Kappa=0.560, P<0.001), not with EUS (McNemar test P=0.019; Kappa=0.266, P=0.015). The accuracy for assessing invasion depth of early esophageal cancer was 86.8% (59/68) by MENBI, 72.1% (49/68) by EUS, respectively,  with statistically significant difference (McNemar test P=0.015; Kappa=0.258, P=0.026). Conclusion ME-NBI and EUS can help to determine the infiltration level of early esophageal cancer. The accuracy of MENBI is higher, which is of high value for the formulation of surgical plans for patients.

Key words: Esophageal neoplasms, Endosonography, Neoplasm invasiveness, Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging