国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (12): 777-781.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20250429-00132

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

MRI联合血清AIF-1、NDRG4对宫颈癌的诊断价值

祖木热来提·艾尼瓦尔, 先君, 韩莉莉()   

  1. 新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院妇科医学诊疗中心乌鲁木齐 830000
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-29 修回日期:2025-05-29 出版日期:2025-12-08 发布日期:2025-12-31
  • 通讯作者: 韩莉莉 E-mail:hanliliabcd@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发项目(2022B03018-1);新疆维吾尔自治区青年科技拔尖人才项目(2022TSYCCX0110)

Diagnostic value of MRI combined with serum AIF-1 and NDRG4 for cervical cancer

Zumurelaiti·Ainiwa'er , Xian Jun, Han Lili()   

  1. Gynecological Medical Treatment CenterPeople's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous RegionUrumqi 830000,China
  • Received:2025-04-29 Revised:2025-05-29 Online:2025-12-08 Published:2025-12-31
  • Contact: Han Lili E-mail:hanliliabcd@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Project in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China(2022B03018-1);Young Scientific and Technological Talents Outstanding Program of Xinjiang Uygur Autono-mous Region of China(2022TSYCCX0110)

摘要:

目的 探究MRI联合血清同种异体移植炎症因子1(AIF-1)、N-myc下游调节因子4(NDRG4)对宫颈癌的诊断价值。方法 选取2022年5月至2024年10月新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院收治的108例原发性宫颈癌患者为研究对象(宫颈癌组),其中FIGO Ⅰ~Ⅱ期67例,Ⅲ期41例。另纳入同期行MRI检查并经病理检查确诊为宫颈良性病变患者175例(宫颈良性病变组),同期体检健康者108例(正常宫颈组)。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定各组血清以及不同FIGO分期宫颈癌患者血清AIF-1、NDRG4水平。采用受试者操作特征曲线评估MRI、AIF-1、NDRG4以及3项联合诊断宫颈癌的价值。结果 正常宫颈组、宫颈良性病变组、宫颈癌组血清AIF-1水平分别为(122.75±23.69)、(183.50±28.33)、(212.73±36.14)pg/ml,差异有统计学意义(F=263.60,P<0.001),AIF-1水平依次升高(均P<0.05)。3组NDRG4水平分别为(134.25±12.33)、(97.48±10.95)、(86.62±10.27)pg/ml,差异有统计学意义(F=581.83,P<0.001),NDRG4水平依次降低(均P<0.05)。FIGO Ⅰ~Ⅱ期、Ⅲ期宫颈癌患者血清AIF-1水平分别为(200.35±34.14)、(232.96±36.22)pg/ml,NDRG4水平分别为(91.73±9.21)、(78.26±8.93)pg/ml,差异均有统计学意义(t=4.71,P<0.001;t=7.46,P<0.001)。MRI、AIF-1、NDRG4单独诊断宫颈癌的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.78、0.76、0.76,3项联合诊断的AUC为0.85,3项联合诊断价值较MRI、AIF-1、NDRG4单独诊断价值高(Z=2.98,P=0.015;Z=3.83,P<0.001;Z=3.83,P<0.001)。结论 MRI联合血清AIF-1、NDRG4具有较高的宫颈癌诊断价值。

关键词: 宫颈肿瘤, 磁共振成像, 诊断, 同种异体移植炎症因子1, N-myc下游调节因子4

Abstract:

Objective To explore the diagnostic value of MRI combined with serum allograft inflammatory factor-1 (AIF-1) and N-myc downstream regulated gene 4 (NDRG4) for cervical cancer. Methods A total of 108 patients with primary cervical cancer admitted at People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region from May 2022 to October 2024 were considered as study objects (cervical cancer group), among which 67 cases were in stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ according to FIGO classification and 41 cases were in stage Ⅲ. In addition, 175 patients who underwent MRI at the same time and were diagnosed as having cervical benign cervical lesions through pathological checkups were included (cervical benign lesion group). A total of 108 healthy individuals who underwent the same-time physical examination were enrolled (normal cervical group). Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the serum levels of AIF-1 and NDRG4 in each group and in patients with different FIGO stages of cervical cancer. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to evaluate the value of MRI, AIF-1, NDRG4 and their combination in the diagnosis of cervical cancer. Results The serum AIF-1 levels of the normal cervical group, the cervical benign lesion group, and the cervical cancer group were (122.75±23.69), (183.50±28.33), and (212.73±36.14) pg/ml, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (F=263.60, P<0.001), and the AIF-1 levels increased successively (both P<0.05). The serum NDRG4 levels of the 3 groups were (134.25±12.33), (97.48±10.95), and (86.62±10.27) pg/ml, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (F=581.83, P<0.001), and the NDRG4 levels decreased successively (both P<0.05). The serum AIF-1 levels of FIGO stage Ⅰ-Ⅱ, stage Ⅲ cervical cancer patients were (200.35±34.14) and (232.96±36.22) pg/ml, the serum NDRG4 levels of the 2 groups were (91.73±9.21) and (78.26±8.93) pg/ml, with statistically significant differences (t=4.71, P<0.001; t=7.46, P<0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for the individual diagnosis of cervical cancer by MRI, AIF-1, and NDRG4 was 0.78, 0.76, and 0.76, respectively. The AUC for the combined diagnosis of the three was 0.85. The diagnostic value of the combined diagnosis was higher than that of MRI, AIF-1, and NDRG4 alone (Z=2.98, P=0.015; Z=3.83, P<0.001; Z=3.83, P<0.001). Conclusions MRI combined with serum AIF-1 and NDRG4 has higher diagnostic value for cervical cancer.

Key words: Uterine cervical neoplasms, Magnetic resonance imaging, Diagnosis, Allograft inflammatory factor-1, N-myc downstream regulated gene 4