国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 233-237.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673422X.2014.03.023

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

吉西他滨联合替吉奥与吉西他滨单药化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌比较的Meta分析

蒋怡帆, 龚建平   

  1. 400010 重庆医科大学附属第二医院肝胆外科
  • 出版日期:2014-03-08 发布日期:2014-03-17
  • 通讯作者: 龚建平, E-mail: gongjianping11@126.com E-mail:gongjianping11@126.com

Gemcitabine plus S-1 versus gemcitabine alone in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a Meta-analysis

 JIANG  Yi-Fan, GONG  Jian-Ping   

  1. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
  • Online:2014-03-08 Published:2014-03-17
  • Contact: Gong Jiangping, E-mail: gongjianping11@126.com E-mail:gongjianping11@126.com

摘要: 目的通过Meta分析,探讨吉西他滨(GEM)联合替吉奥(S-1)和GEM单药化疗在晚期胰腺癌治疗中的意义。方法计算机检索Pubmed、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、中国知网数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库,查找从数据库建库至2013年8月1日国内外已发表的相关文献。选择治疗组为GEM联合S1化疗,对照组为GEM单药化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌的随机对照试验。由两位评价者分别检索、收集资料,按纳入标准入选,主要分析指标为生存优势(包括生存率和疾病无进展生存率),次要分析指标为客观缓解率、疾病控制率和不良反应。结果共纳入3个随机对照试验。Meta分析显示GEM+S1联合化疗能明显延长患者的疾病无进展生存期(HR=0.64,95%CI为0.54~0.75,P<0.000 01)及总生存期(HR=0.81,95%CI为0.68~0.96,P=0.01),提高客观缓解率[风险差异(risk difference,RD)=0.16,95%CI为0.10~0.21,P<0.000 01]及疾病控制率(RD=0.10,95%CI 0.03~0.17,P=0.009),但同时3、4级不良反应也明显升高,中性粒细胞减少增加18%(P=0.02)、血小板减少增加6%(P=0.008)、胃肠道反应增加8%(P<0.000 01)。结论GEM联合S1用于晚期胰腺癌患者疗效确有明显提高,虽不良反应也明显增加,但总体生存获益有所提高。

关键词: 胰腺肿瘤, 药物疗法, Meta分析, 吉西他滨

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the gemcitabine (GEM) plus S1 and gemcitabine alone in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) by metaanalysis. MethodsArticles were searched in PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, CNKI, and CBM up to August 1st, 2013. Only randomized controlled trails (RCTs) for GEM+S1 and GEM alone in advanced PC were included. Two reviewers retrieved and collected data respectively. Data were selected basing on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The metaanalysis was base on survival advantage (include overall survival and progress free survival), object response rate, disease control rate and adverse reaction. ResultsA total of 3 trials with 772 cases were included. Metaanalysis demonstrated that GEM plus S1 significantly improved the progress free survival (HR: 0.64, 95%CI: 0.540.75, P<0.000 01) and overall survival (HR: 0.81, 95%CI: 0.680.96, P=0.01), improved object response rate (RD: 0.16, 95%CI: 0.100.21, P<0.000 01) and disease control rate (RD: 0.10, 95%CI: 0.030.17, P=0.009) also. However, the incidence of WHO 3/4 grade adverse reaction was increased significantly in the GEM+S1 group. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and gastrointestinal reaction were increased by 18% (P=0.02), 18% (P=0.008) and 8% (P<0.000 01) respectively. ConclusionGEM combined with S1 can improve the chemotherapy effect compared with GEM alone. The adverse reactions also increase significantly, but the overall survival is benefit.

Key words: Pancreatic neoplasms, Drug therapy, Metaanalysis, Gemcitabine