国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (7): 426-433.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn371439-20251009-00069

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

放疗同步替加氟栓联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗老年食管癌的疗效与安全性

马池銮1, 贾殿军1, 魏冬冬1, 王井润2, 李欣萍1, 赵博艳1, 赵悦1()   

  1. 1 河北省沧州市中心医院胸部肿瘤放疗科沧州 061000
    2 河北省沧州市中心医院肿瘤放射治疗室沧州 061000
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-09 出版日期:2026-07-08 发布日期:2026-06-25
  • 通讯作者: 赵悦,Email: zhaoyue0185@163.com
  • 作者简介:第一联系人:

    马池銮:研究设计及实施、论文撰写及修改;贾殿军、魏冬冬:研究实施、论文修改;王井润、李欣萍、赵博艳:数据收集、整理及分析,论文修改;赵悦:研究设计、研究指导、论文修改及经费支持

  • 基金资助:
    沧州市重点研发计划(213106050)

Efficacy and safety of concurrent radiotherapy combined with tegafur suppositories and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of elderly patients with esophageal cancer

Ma Chiluan1, Jia Dianjun1, Wei Dongdong1, Wang Jingrun2, Li Xinping1, Zhao Boyan1, Zhao Yue1()   

  1. 1 Department of Thoracic Oncology RadiotherapyCangzhou Central Hospital of Hebei ProvinceCangzhou 061000, China
    2 Department of Radiation OncologyCangzhou Central Hospital of Hebei ProvinceCangzhou 061000, China
  • Received:2025-10-09 Online:2026-07-08 Published:2026-06-25
  • Contact: Zhao Yue, Email: zhaoyue0185@163.com
  • Supported by:
    Key Research and Development Program of Cangzhou City of China(213106050)

摘要:

目的 分析放疗同步替加氟栓联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗老年食管癌的疗效与安全性。 方法 收集2019年12月至2025年4月于河北省沧州市中心医院收治的52例行同步放化疗联合/不联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的不可切除老年(≥65岁)食管鳞状细胞癌患者的临床资料。根据患者放疗同步替加氟栓化疗期间是否联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗,将患者分为同步放化疗联合免疫组[放疗同步替加氟栓联合程序性死亡受体1(PD-1)抑制剂,替加氟栓和PD-1抑制剂使用2年或直至肿瘤进展/不能耐受或患者自行终止治疗,n=27]、同步放化疗组(放疗同步替加氟栓,替加氟栓使用2年或直至肿瘤进展/不能耐受或患者自行终止治疗,n=25)。所有患者同步放化疗结束后1~3个月复查,评估疗效。比较两组患者的客观缓解率(ORR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、不良反应发生情况等。绘制Kaplan-Meier生存曲线进行生存分析并行log-rank检验,采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析患者预后影响因素。 结果 同步放化疗联合免疫组与同步放化疗组的ORR分别为55.6%(15/27)和24.0%(6/25),中位PFS分别为19.0个月和10.0个月,中位OS分别为33.3个月和23.3个月,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=5.37,P=0.020;χ2=10.60,P=0.001;χ2=5.10,P=0.024)。单因素分析显示,美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体力状况(PS)评分(HR=5.02,95%CI为2.40~10.53,P<0.001;HR=10.32,95%CI为3.55~30.04,P<0.001)、TNM分期(HR=6.14,95%CI为2.80~13.42,P<0.001;HR=5.93,95%CI为2.32~15.15,P<0.001)及治疗模式(HR=0.36,95%CI为0.19~0.68,P=0.002;HR=0.39,95%CI为0.17~0.91,P=0.030)均为患者PFS、OS的影响因素。多因素分析显示,TNM分期(HR=5.65,95%CI为2.07~15.43,P=0.001)和治疗模式(HR=0.32,95%CI为0.16~0.64,P=0.001)均为PFS的独立影响因素;ECOG PS评分(HR=5.31,95%CI为1.59~17.73,P=0.007)和TNM分期(HR=3.36,95%CI为1.10~10.29,P=0.034)均为OS的独立影响因素。两组患者出现的主要不良反应包括放射性食管炎、放射性肺炎、血液学毒性、恶心/呕吐等,大多为1~2级,给予对症处理或治疗结束后均缓解。同步放化疗联合免疫组与同步放化疗组放射性肺炎的发生率分别为51.9%(14/27)和44.0%(11/25),差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.32,P=0.571)。 结论 放疗同步替加氟栓联合免疫检查点抑制剂治疗老年食管癌疗效确切,安全性良好。

关键词: 老年人, 食管肿瘤, 放射疗法, 免疫疗法, 替加氟栓

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of concurrent radiotherapy combined with tegafur suppositories and immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Methods The clinical data of 52 elderly patients (aged ≥65 years) with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors in Cangzhou Central Hospital of Hebei Province from December 2019 to April 2025 were collected. According to whether the patients received immune checkpoint inhibitors during concurrent radiotherapy and tegafur suppository chemotherapy, they were divided into the concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy group [concurrent radiotherapy with tegafur suppositories combined with programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, tegafur suppositories combined with PD-1 inhibitors were administered for up to 2 years—or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal, n=27] and the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group (concurrent radiotherapy with tegafur suppositories, tegafur suppositories were administered for up to 2 years—or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient withdrawal, n=25). All patients underwent comprehensive reassessment 1-3 months after treatment completion to determine tumor response. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), adverse reactions, etc. were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared via log-rank tests. The Cox proportional risk regression model was performed to identify prognostic influencing factors. Results The ORR of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy group and the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group were 55.6% (15/27) and 24.0% (6/25), respectively, with statistically significant difference (χ2=5.37, P=0.020). The median PFS of the concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy group and the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group were 19.0 and 10.0 months, respectively; and the median OS were 33.3 months and 23.3 months, respectively, with statistically significant differences (χ2=10.60, P=0.001; χ2=5.10, P=0.024). Univariate analysis revealed that Eastem Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) score (HR=5.02, 95%CI: 2.40-10.53, P<0.001; HR=10.32, 95%CI: 3.55-30.04, P<0.001), TNM stage (HR=6.14, 95%CI: 2.80-13.42, P<0.001; HR=5.93, 95%CI: 2.32-15.15, P<0.001), and treatment modality (HR=0.36, 95%CI: 0.19-0.68, P=0.002; HR=0.39, 95%CI: 0.17-0.91, P=0.030) were influencing factors of both PFS and OS of patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed TNM stage (HR=5.65, 95%CI: 2.07-15.43, P=0.001) and treatment modality (HR=0.32, 95%CI: 0.16-0.64, P=0.001) as independent factors influencing PFS, and ECOG PS score (HR=5.31, 95%CI: 1.59-17.73, P=0.007) and TNM stage (HR=3.36, 95%CI: 1.10-10.29, P=0.034) as independent factors influencing OS. Adverse reactions of the two groups of patients were mainly radiation esophagitis, radiation pneumonitis, hematological toxicity, nausea/vomiting, etc. which were mostly grade 1-2, and resolved after symptomatic treatment or termination of treatment. The incidence rates of radiation pneumonitis were 51.9% (14/27) in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus immunotherapy group and 44.0% (11/25) in the concurrent chemoradiotherapy group, with no statistically significant difference (χ2=0.32, P=0.571). Conclusions Concurrent radiotherapy combined with tegafur suppositories and immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrates superior antitumor efficacy and acceptable safety in elderly patients with unresectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Key words: Aged, Esophageal neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Immunotherapy, Tegafur suppositories