国际肿瘤学杂志

国际肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 952-954.doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-422X.2013.12.022

• 情报信息 • 上一篇    

2012年CBM和SCI收录中国肿瘤学论文 对比分析

甄天民, 马霞, 李静丽, 韩志琰, 杨文燕, 张晶晶, 孙娜   

  1. 250062济南，山东省医药卫生科技信息研究所 山东省医学科学院
  • 出版日期:2013-12-10 发布日期:2013-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 甄天民 E-mail:tmzhen@sina.com

Comparative analysis of Chinese oncology papers included by CBM and SCI in 2012

ZHEN  Tian-Min, MA  Xia, LI  Jing-Li, HAN  Zhi-Yan, YANG  Wen-Yan, ZHANG  Jing-Jing, SUN  Na   

  1. Shandong Institute of Medicine and Health Information, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Ji′nan 250062, China
  • Online:2013-12-10 Published:2013-12-26
  • Contact: ZHEN Tian-Min E-mail:tmzhen@sina.com

摘要： 目的分析对比2012年中国生物医学文献数据库（CBM）和科学引文索引（SCI）收录的中国肿瘤学论文，全面客观地反映我国肿瘤学论文国内国际发表现状。方法通过CBM和SCI两个数据库检索2012年中国肿瘤学相关论文，对学科分布、地区分布、机构分布和被引情况进行统计分析。结果2012年CBM数据库收录我国作者为第一作者的肿瘤学论文67 071篇，SCI收录中国肿瘤学相关论文9226篇；2012年CBM和SCI数据库收录论文数量排名前3位的地区分别为江苏省（6707篇）、广东省（6277篇）、北京市（4897篇）和北京市（2214篇）、上海市（2008篇）、广东省（1393篇）；发文数量最多的机构均为高等院校（分别为9725篇、5755篇）；基金资助均以国家自然科学基金最多（分别为4710篇，占35.38%；3290篇，占35.68%）。结论2012年中国肿瘤学论文被CBM收录的数量远大于SCI收录的数量，但在质量方面较SCI收录文章有较大差异。通过对比分析，对我国医学工作者在科研方向的选择上有一定启示作用。

关键词: 医学肿瘤学, 中国, 文献计量学, CBM数据库, SCIExpanded数据库

Abstract: ObjectiveTo analyze Chinese oncology papers included by Chinese biomedical literature database (CBM) and science citation index (SCI), and to comprehensively and objectively reflect the current situation of Chinese oncology literatures published in domestic and international journals. MethodsChinese oncology papers were retrieved by using CBM and SCI. A comparison analysis was made from the respects of subject distribution, district distribution, organization distribution and high citation situation. Results67 071 papers of 2012 were retrieved from CBM database, while 9226 papers were indexed by SCI. In terms of district distribution, the first three districts were Jiangsu (6707), Guangdong (4897) and Beijing (2214) in CBM database, while in SCI database, they were Beijing (2214), Shanghai (2008) and Guangdong (1393). The institute with the most amount of literature is university, respectively 9725 and 5755. Moreover, the mostly funded project is National Natural Science Foundation (4710, 35.38%; 3290, 35.68%). ConclusionThe 2012 Chinese oncology literatures published in domestic journals has advantage with respect to quantity, compared with the international published journals. However, there exists a bigger difference in terms of quality. Through the comparative analysis, the medical researchers in our country will have some implications in the research orientation.

Key words: Medical oncology, China, Bibliometrics, CBM database, SCIExpanded database